Originally published by:engineering.com
M4S Take

This article underscores the need for a fundamental shift in how engineers and manufacturers perceive 3D printing, moving away from the idea of it as a direct replacement for traditional methods. The economic and technical benefits of a complementary approach are becoming increasingly clear.

The Problem: Mischaracterization of 3D Printing's Role

At this year's RAPID + TCT conference, Rajeev Kulkarni, Chief Strategy Officer of Axtra3D, addressed a fundamental misconception that has plagued the additive manufacturing (AM) industry since its inception. The prevailing narrative has often positioned 3D printing as a direct replacement for traditional manufacturing methods. Kulkarni argues that this approach is fundamentally flawed. "3D printing is not a one-to-one substitute for conventional manufacturing," he asserts. "It is a complementary tool that should be integrated into the existing manufacturing ecosystem."

The issue stems from the early days of 3D printing, where the technology was often touted as a revolutionary alternative to traditional methods. This positioning, while ambitious, set unrealistic expectations and led to misunderstandings about the technology's true capabilities and optimal use cases.

The Solution: A Complementary Approach

Kulkarni emphasizes the importance of viewing 3D printing as a complementary technology rather than a direct competitor to traditional manufacturing. "There are certain volumes and applications where 3D printing excels, and others where traditional methods are more appropriate," he explains. "The key is to understand where each technology fits and how they can be integrated to maximize efficiency and innovation."

He advocates for a blended approach, where 3D printing is used in conjunction with traditional methods to leverage the strengths of both. For instance, 3D printing can be particularly effective for low-volume production runs, complex geometries, and rapid prototyping, while traditional methods may be more cost-effective for high-volume, standardized parts.

Kulkarni also highlights the need for engineers to rethink their design processes. "Design for AM is not the same as designing for traditional manufacturing," he notes. "Engineers need to embrace the design freedom that 3D printing offers and rethink their approach to part design. This means moving away from simply printing existing designs and instead, designing parts specifically for AM."

The Results: A Shift in Manufacturing Culture

The impact of this paradigm shift is already evident in Axtra3D's work with ceramic mold inserts. This application, according to Kulkarni, is one of his favorites because it exemplifies the transformative potential of 3D printing. "We're changing the culture of how low-volume production is done within organizations," he says. "By using 3D printing for ceramic mold inserts, we're able to achieve levels of precision and complexity that were previously unattainable with traditional methods."

This approach has led to significant improvements in efficiency and cost-effectiveness for low-volume production. By integrating 3D printing into their manufacturing processes, companies can reduce lead times, minimize waste, and achieve greater design flexibility.

"I think our ceramic mold inserts is my favorite [application]. [...] We're changing the culture of how low-volume production is done within organization."

##

SM

Simon McLoughlin

Founder & Editor, M4S News

20+ years in manufacturing and engineering. I started M4S News to cut through the noise and deliver real intelligence to the people who actually make things. When I'm not writing or editing, I'm talking to engineers on factory floors.

Is this your company?

This article features your business. Claim it to add your logo, contact details, and a link to your website — or upgrade to reach more buyers.

Did you know 80% of Press Releases trigger AI content warnings? Reach out and the M4S team can assist.